I think that “shocking” art is necessary and vital to keep art fresh and exciting for both the artist and the audience. I will say that there is definitely a boundary to be crossed, and I think that boundary is crossed when children are harmed or sexualized or animals are harmed. However, if the artist themselves are consciously putting themselves in danger, I think that is fine. They know what they are getting themselves into and they know what point they want to make, like with Chris Burden’s Shoot.
I do not think I am qualified enough to comment on someone else’s art. I do not think it is my place, since my art is nowhere near as shocking or controversial as others. If someone is making the art that they want and they feel good about, without harming innocent people, then that is good on them. Like with separating artists from their art, I am a little torn on where to create a clear line.