Fu Baoshi (Met)

Fu Baoshi was born in 1904 in China. He is known for his ink brush paintings. He was a painter, an art historian, and a seal carver. Fu was mostly self taught. In 1933 he attended Tokyo School of Fine Arts to study the History of Oriental Art. He returned to China in 1935 and taught in the Art Department at Central University, now Nanjing University. Fu masterfully combined foreign styles with strong nationalistic styles. His work was unique and bold. He used traditional brush work and added in strong colors. His landscape paintings show his skills with inking dots. He created several new techniques that melded well into the traditional styles. Fu believed that an artist needed to be emotionally and physically present in their art. To accomplish this Fu would often paint while inebriated. He created a spattered-ink method to create “action art”. This spontaneous style is similar to Abstract Expressionism.

Fu was very proud of his nation. On his travels he would paint landscapes that captured his attention. The MET is currently showing a an extensive display of the artist’s oeuvre. The collection starts with Fu’s earliest works that are modeled after traditional Chinese masters. Then the collection moves to works that interpret the poems of Qu Yuan. The poet became famous for killing himself to prove his loyalty. Another of Fu’s paintings, Drunken Monk, is a portrait of a Buddhist monk that worked while inebriated, like Fu. He uses these works to refect his own thoughts and feelings.

As you move further through the exhibition you come to a room full of landscapes. Fu’s use of color comes to full force in these. Powerfully red suns and soft pink skies showcase his masterful use of color. This exhibition is worth seeing. It holds the largest collection of Fu’s works outside of Asia.

Hyungsub Shin (Korean Art Fair)

Hyungsub Shin went to high school at 부평고등학교. He graduated in 1988, and attended Hongik University in Seoul, South Korea.  He graduated from university in 1996. For grad school Shin ventured across the sea to NYC’s School of Visual Arts. He still lives in NYC with his wife, Sanghee Yoo.

Shin participated in the Korean Art Show that we visited during our trip. This show is designed to showcase the rising art of Korea. This year is the third year of the event. Over 10,000 visitors experienced the contemporary Korean art last year. Fifteen Korean galleries will take over 82 Mercer St, NY, NY. Hyungsub Shin is one of the special exhibitors.

Shin makes sculptural pieces. He has placed art on buildings, sidewalks, bridges, and in parks. His works have an organic feel. He uses only a few materials to create the forms, some have only one material.

Shin also paints. His paintings take on free organic forms similar to his sculptures.

Shin is participating in the Korean Art Show to increase awareness of Korean art to the world. New York is the best place to share their culture with the world. He is using traditional Korean ideals in his art work, bold color, natural forms and surface decoration.

 

 

Surasi Kusolwong (PS1)

Surasi Kusolwong was born in Ayutthaya, Thailand in 1965. He is based in Bangkok, Thailand. Surasi creates experiences, not forms. He builds pieces centered on themes of economic exchange. He creates works that involve viewer interaction.  Surasi is inspired by Asian culture. He continuously delves into works that reflect consumer society. Surasi wants his work to become a memory for the viewer.

He created a project called Minimal Factory ($1 Market)/Red Bull Party (with D.J.) (2002). In this project he recreated a Thai market inside a gallery space. All of the Thailand produced objects were sold for one dollar each. These were practical items that consumers could use in everyday life. Surasi observed in this project that many people were purchasing things for family and friends. Sharing the experience makes it become more than about oneself.

The project that was shown during our visit to NYC at PS1 was called Golden Ghost (The Future Belongs to the Ghosts). He filled a large gallery space with wool waste. In the massive expanse of fabric he hid 10 golden necklaces. The piece highly encourages audience participation, because if you are lucky enough to find a necklace, you get to keep it. The piece is playful but it is also a metaphor for consumption.

He has shown internationally, including exhibitions at MoMA P.S.1; Hayward Gallery, London; and Kiasma Museum of Contemporary Art, Helsinki.

Sadly, no one in our group found one of the pure gold necklaces. I searched for nearly an hour and a half with no luck. Even though we walked away without the gold, it was fun to play in the room full of wool.

Guggenheim: John chamberlain

After looking through the other pieces that the Guggenheim had, I went all the way to the top of the museum. I tried my best not to look down for fear I might slip and just fall all the way down.


John chamberlain
April 16, 1927 – December 21, 2011.

John is famous for being an abstract expressionist  artist, using metals from car parts in the 1950’s and into the early 60’s. He has used other mediums such as:  brown paper bags, foam rubber, wood, iron, Mylar, colored glass, mirrors, Plexiglas, tin, aluminum foil and paper and cloth towels. What makes Chamberlain a controversial artist is that he broke centuries-long tradition which most sculpture where cast or carved and usually monochromatic. We weren’t aloud to take pictures. The following were found online.


Women’s Voices, 2005

I would have to say this is my favorite out of all that was shone in the Guggenheim. In my opinion, this depicted how sharp a ladies words can be. A ladies voice can be elegant and smooth, but in this work it shows me that it can also be loud, deafening and overpowering. Funny, but this piece makes me thing of my mothers voice; how it can quickly flow through the air, but can change into sounds of anger and stress but still flow through the atmosphere.

 

 


Luna, Luna, Luna 1970

 

 


Rooster Starfoot, 1976

 

Chamberlain is not really my favorite artist, but I do like how he tried to break the normal form of creating sculptures. Using color and bent metal to make movement, almost making the image like its flat, is something to admire from him. He was extremely creative.

 

MoMA – The Museum of Modern Art: Van Gogh

After getting up early in the morning, walking for a “couple” of blocks, and taking the subway five times, the group finally got to the MoMA. This museum is six stories high and filled with pieces that could leave you staying there for about a good week. On the fifth floor, the museum houses the work of Vincent Van Gogh. Vincent Van Gogh was born on March 30, 1853 and died 29 July 1890.  He was a Dutch post impressionist Painter. Van Gogh loved art from an early age and began to draw as a child.  He continued making drawings throughout his early life leading to his decision to become an artist. He did not begin painting until his late twenties. He produced more than 2,100 artworks, consisting of 860 oil paintings and more than 1,300 watercolors, drawings, sketches and prints. One of his early aspirations was to become a pastor and from 1879 he worked as a missionary in a mining region in Belgium where he began to sketch people from the local community.

In the exhibit holds one of Van Gogh’s famous pieces “The Starry Night.” The paint is applied thickly, so that the brush strokes build up on top of each other

.

Portrait of Joseph Roulin, a postal employee in the southern French town of Arles; one of the few closest friends that Vincent Van go did a portrait of.

Vincent van Gogh’s paintings are just filled with so much color and beauty that it’s kinda sad when you learn about his death; he died at the age of  37  from suicide, a gunshot wound to the head. Even though he died at such a young age he was still a wonderful artist and the world will always remember him.

 

NYC 2012

6 students and myself drove 15 hours yesterday to make our way from Cleveland, Tennessee to Brooklyn, NY. I have never driven through the actual city before, always taking the long way through Staten Island to avoid going through Manhattan. This time, at the encouragement of the other artists in the van, we went for it. An hour later and with no accidents, we were in Brooklyn.

Today we’re visiting the Museum of the Moving Image, the Guggenheim Museum, Smack Mellon and Times Square.

 

 

Mayan Jewelry at the Metropolitan Museum of Art

The Mayans were all about jewelry and creating handcrafted pieces of art. They discovered jade stones and made a lot of jewelry out of these precious gems. Jewelry was very important to the Mayans and it determined social class in most cases. Jewelry shaped like animals were especially popular. Mayan headdresses were an important symbol of power.  Mayan masks were made from many different jewels. They were made from gold, obsidian, stone, wood, and even shell, which would be inlayed, or encrusted with tiny pieces of jade arranged in a mosaic pattern.

Maya art was crazy-vibrant and this was because of a certain type of blue they used called “maya-blue”  which was an indigo dye which came from a plant called “anil” which they combined with a clay called palygorskite. Towards the end of the “early post classic” era their jade supply started running short and they had to find other stones to adorn themselves with. During this time they started using different types of greenstone such as serpentine, as well as turquoise which is so popular today.

The Metropolitan has a beautiful collection of Mayan artifacts and jewelry. I saw a pair of “Earflare” Frontals which would be mounted through the earlobe. These were made out of jade and just looking at this pair of earflares you could tell the Mayans were all about agriculture and plantlife. This shows up in the colors of the jewelry which were green and blue hues and on top of the earthy colors, the design happened to be floral. This was very interesting to see because it was from an entire different era and despite its very small size (only about two inches) it was fascinating seeing something so old and yet so modern looking. Below is a picture of the Earflares themselves.

 

 

Botticelli- Renaissance Portraits at the Met.

Being a long time fan of Botticelli, I was thrilled when I got to see some of his portraits at the Met. The portraits I saw were side by side and they were called “Portrait of an Ideal Lady”. These portraits were beautiful, from their porcelain skin down to the braids in their hair and the garments they wore. They are both said to be depictions of a woman, Simonetta Vespucci, who was said to be the most beautiful woman in Florence, Italy. She was a noblewoman from Genoa and married Marco Vespucci, which after that she was introduced to the Florentine Court.

Located in Florence the painting “The Birth of Venus” is another one of Botticelli’s paintings (probably one of his most famous) and Venus is said to be modeled after Simonetta Vespucci herself although this is up to much dispute. The Medici brothers were even said to be entranced by this woman, Simonetta Vespucci.

The portraits definitely stood out to me among the rest of the portraits I saw at the Met. Botticelli had a very distinct style that anyone who has studied art can pinpoint. He would elongate his subjects, stretch limbs to help out the composition, and have a very fantasy like quality to all of his work. Seeing these paintings in person was incredible and I can’t imagine someone just giving it one glance and walking away. She is truly entrancing.

 

  

 

 

 

Victorian Electrotypes at the Met.

Before going to New York and seeing all of the great artwork different areas of the world had to offer, I had come across “Victorian Electrotypes” on the Metropolitan Museum of Art website. These “electrotypes” were working, useful mechanisms which at the same time were pieces of art as well. I was excited to see them in person during our trip.

The electrotypes I saw were mostly silver in color and were very detailed in person. The website’s pictures did not do them justice. One in particular stood out from the rest to me. It is “Diana and the Stag”. Diana in greek mythology was the goddess of hunt, birthing, and moon. She is normally shown with a deer which is symbolic of her hunting skill. The Met also had another piece that I saw about her which was massive and showed her wielding a bow and arrow.

“Diana and the Stag” was made in 1610 by Joachim Frieze. This electrotype was made out of silver, gilt, gems, wood and iron workings. This piece was used in drinking games and it would be wound up at the bottom, carry the drink to one of the participants at the table ,and that person would have to drink all of the contents in the statue. The way it opened up for the drink was interesting: the head of the stag would open, itself. Below is a picture of this piece.

 

Francisco de Goya at the Metropolitan Museum of Art.

One person’s art work that I didn’t expect to see at the Metropolitan was Francisco de Goya’s. Goya was a Spanish romantic painter and is considered the last of the Old Masters and the first of the new ones. I have admired Goya’s pieces ever sense I came across some in my Art History  book in school. He is very imaginative but dark at the same time. His works started to become much more dark, imaginative, and just plain insane towards the end of his life. He eventually went insane and covered his house in these dark paintings which no one knew about except for him at the time.

One  painting that I didn’t know was his before I went to the Met is called “Manuel Osorio Manrique de Zuñiga”. This piece was commissioned by the Altimiras, a royal family in Spain. In the painting it shows a boy dressed in red and white from head to toe playing with a pet magpie. In the background you can see three alley cats and a birdcage with a bird inside it as well. The bird could represent innocence, Goya may have been trying to show the sometimes frail line between innocence and the forces of darkness and evil. Goya often dabbled in dark subject matter so this painting is believed to have been started after the boy died. This painting is one of my favorites by Goya because it has a good backstory to it as well as an eerie quality to it as well. My grandmother actually got a reproduction of this painting for me a long time ago before I even knew who Francisco de Goya was. It definitely speaks volumes to me as well as many other people who have seen it in person.